Skip to main content

Web Content Display Web Content Display

Jagiellonian University - Journal of IP Law

Jagiellonian University - Journal of IP Law


Prace z Prawa Własności Intelektualnej (ZNUJ PPWI) is a periodical published as part of Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego journal and continues Prace z Wynalazczości i Ochrony Własności Intelektualnej (ZNUJ PWiOWI), published since 1973. Since mid-2008 the periodical has been published as a quarterly by Wolters Kluwer Polska. It is published regularly towards the end of the last month of each quarter.


ZNUJ PPWI discusses all aspects of intellectual property law (including copyright and neighbouring rights, industrial property law, competition protection law, media law, and information law). The published texts focus on various problems from the field of intellectual property law from the point of view of international law, EU law, and domestic law. The mission of ZNUJ PPWI is to present the most important issues of this very quickly developing branch of law (which is linked particularly to the growth of new technologies). Authors of articles published in the periodical are often the most distinguished academics and experts affiliated in various domestic and foreign universities and institutions, as well as practitioners (including judges, advocates, attorneys at law, patent agents) specializing in intellectual property law.


Editorial Board


prof. Andrzej Matlak (editor in chief)

dr. Dariusz Kasprzycki (subject editor)

dr. Michał Markiewicz (editor)

dr. Justyna Ożegalska-Trybalska (editor)

dr. Tomasz Targosz (subject editor)

dr. hab. Anna Tischner (subject editor)

dr. Michał Wyrwiński (editor)

Beata Olędzka (editorial coordinator)

Klaudia Szawłowska-Milczarek (director of the Department of Periodicals)


Scientific Council


prof. Janusz Barta - Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

prof. Jan Błeszyński - Uniwersytet Warszawski

prof. Monika Czajkowska-Dąbrowska - Uniwersytet Warszawski

prof. Thomas Dreier - Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

prof. Bogusław Gawlik - Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

prof. Reto M. Hilty - Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition

prof. Wojciech Kowalski - Uniwersytet Śląski

prof. Ryszard Markiewicz - Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

prof. Bogdan Michalski - Uniwersytet Warszawski

prof. Aurelia Nowicka - Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

prof. Ewa Nowińska - Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

prof. Maksymilian Pazdan - Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego

prof. Maria Poźniak-Niedzielska - Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

prof. Joanna Sieńczyło-Chlabicz - Uniwersytet w Białymstoku

prof. Ryszard Skubisz - Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

prof. Janusz Szwaja - Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego

prof. Elżbieta Traple - Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie



Ethical principles concerning publications in academic journals


Wolters Kluwer Polska publishing house, part of Wolters Kluwer international concern, which is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE),, applies the organization’s standards and recommendations in the publishing process.


Ethical principles for authors 


We only accept original, previously unpublished manuscripts for publication. Submitting the same manuscripts to more than one journal is considered inappropriate. The author represents that he/she has not expressed and will not express consent for another journal to publish the manuscript. If the aforementioned representation is found not to be true, the editorial board has the right to refuse to publish the manuscript.


Authors can submit for publication only their own original manuscripts. Plagiarism or data fabrication constitute academic misconduct.


Please provide (in notes) information about the sources of funding for a given publication, such as domestic or international grants, subsidies from foundations, associations or commercial institutions.


In case of co-authorship, please state the percentages which individual authors contributed to the publication.


The author is responsible for the manuscript reflecting the current state of law, quoted provisions of law, case law and literature. If, after manuscript submission, the author finds an error or inaccuracy in it, the author has a duty to promptly notify the editorial board about it.


The author should make references to the publications which had an influence on the submitted manuscript in the form of quotes and in the attached bibliography.


The author warrants that the copyright in the manuscript, which copyright is transferred to the publisher upon the editorial board accepting the manuscript, will not be limited by any third party rights, that the use and disposal of the manuscript by the publisher will not infringe personal interests or rights of third parties.


The manuscripts submitted by the authors are published on the basis of publishing agreements with authors, where all copyright law issues are regulated.


Ghostwriting. In order to counteract cases of ghostwriting or guest authorship, authors have a duty to disclose to the editorial board and notify it about the contributions of individual authors in the creation of the publication (stating their affiliations and contributions, i.e. who is the author of conceptions, assumptions, methods, etc. used in preparing the publication). The main responsibility for that is borne by the author who submits the manuscript. Authors are obligated to provide the editorial board with information about the contributions of scientific research institutions, associations, and other entities. The editorial board informs that ghostwriting and guest authorship are regarded as scientific misconduct. Any detected cases will be exposed, including notifying the relevant entities (institutions employing such authors, academic societies, associations of academic editors, etc.).


Responsibilities of the editorial board


The editorial board documents any cases of academic misconduct, especially violations and infringements of the ethical principles applicable in the academia.


Any decision to publish an article is based on reviews, the opinion of the subject editor and the editorial college. The decision whether or not to publish is also influenced by the risk of copyright violations.


In the process of making the decision to accept or reject a given academic manuscript, the important factors include originality, academic quality, and compatibility with the journal’s range of topics.


No member of the editorial board can disclose any information about any submitted manuscript to any other person than - in accordance with the editorial procedure - its author, reviewers, potential reviewers or the publisher.


The editorial board does not disclose reviewers’ data to authors.


Information obtained in the process of publication evaluation, as well as the rejected manuscripts or their fragments, cannot be used in own research of the editorial board members or reviewers without the author’s express written consent.


The editorial board does not appoint as reviewers any persons who report directly to the manuscript authors or who are in any other direct personal or professional relations with them to the extent that might result in conflicts of interests.


Responsibilities of reviewers


Manuscripts are reviewed before publication. For the academic evaluation of each manuscript, the editorial board appoints at least two reviewers from among the members of the academic council, editorial college or other specialists in the field that the manuscript concerns.


The names of the reviewers of particular manuscripts are not disclosed to authors. The list of reviewers who cooperate with the journal, without naming the reviewer of a specific manuscript, is published on the journal’s website and in its printed version.


A reviewer supports the editor-in-chief in making editorial decisions and may also support the author in improving the manuscript.


Each selected reviewer who is unable to review a manuscript or knows that it is impossible to quickly prepare a review should inform the managing editor about it.


Reviews should be objective. Personal critique of the author is considered improper. Reviewers should express their views clearly, supporting them with appropriate arguments.


All reviewed manuscripts must be treated as confidential documents. They cannot be shown to or discussed about with any other persons than the managing editor, who is authorized.


Confidential information or ideas inspired by the review must be kept secret and cannot be used in order to gain personal benefits. Reviewers should not review manuscripts where there is a conflict of interests resulting from the relationship with the author, company or institution connected with the manuscript.


Reviewers should identify the publications that the manuscript author failed to refer to. A reviewer should also inform the managing editor about any significant similarity, partial overlap of the contents of the manuscript under review with any other published work known to the reviewer or a suspected plagiarism.