Niniejszy zbiór materiałów został opracowany przez Mateusza Kupca w ramach realizacji projektu badawczego kierowanego przez prof. dr. hab. Ryszarda Markiewicza pt. „Naukowy model reformy prawa autorskiego na jednolitym rynku cyfrowym według Dyrektyw UE” (nr projektu: 2019/35/B/HS5/03671) sfinansowanego przez Narodowe Centrum Nauki

Stan na 29 grudnia 2021 r.

 

MONOGRAFIE I PRACE ZBIOROWE

• Biernat M., Remote education during pandemic,
• Bulayenko O. et al., Study on Emerging Issues on Collective Licensing Practices in the Digital Environment (November 23, 2021). Final Report for the Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology (DG CNECT) of the European Commission, SMART 2018/0069, doi: 10.2759/611658,
• Lazarova A. et al., Creative Commons Statement on the Opt-Out Exception Regime / Rights Reservation Regime for Text and Data Mining under Article 4 of the EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market,
• Markiewicz R., Prawa autorskie na jednolitym rynku cyfrowym. Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego  i Rady (UE) 2019/790, Wolters Kluwer 2021,
• Rosati E., Copyright in the Digital Single Market. Article-by-Article Commentary to the Provisions of Directive 2019/790, Oxford University Press 2021,
• Rendas T., Exceptions in EU Copyright Law. In Search of a Balance Between Flexibility and Legal Certainty, Wolters Kluwer 2021,
• Synodinou TE., Jougleux P., Markou C., Prastitou-Merdi T., red. EU Internet Law in the Digital Single Market, Springer 2021 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-69583-5_4

ROZDZIAŁY W PRACACH ZBIOROWYCH

• Angelopoulos Ch., Primary and accessory liability in EU copyright law [w:] Handbook of European Copyright Law, red. E. Rosati, Routledge, 2021,
• Garstka K., Guiding the Blind Bloodhounds: How to Mitigate the Risks art. 17 of Directive 2019/790 Poses to the Freedom of Expression [w:] Intellectual Property and Human Rights, red. P. Torremans, Aalphen aan den Rijn 2020,
• Ginsburg J., A United States Perspective on Digital Single Market Directive art. 17 [w:] EU Copyright Law: A Commentary, red. I. Stamatoudi, P. Torremans, Cheltenham 2020,
• Grischka P., Kunsthistorische Publikationen und Bildrechte zwischen dem BGH-Urteil zu Museumsfotos (2018) und der Umsetzung der Richtlinie (EU) 2019/790, [w:]  Die Zukunft des kunsthistorischen Publizierens, red. M.  Effinger, H.Kohle, Heidelberg 2021
• Husovec M., How Europe Wants to Redefine Global Online Copyright Enforcement [w:] Pluralism or Universalism in International Copyright Law, red. T.E. Synodinou,  Alphen aan den Rijn 2019,
• Husovec M., Too Small to Matter? On the Copyright Directive’s bias in favour of big right-holders [w:] Global Intellectual Property Protection and New Constitutionalism. Hedging Exclusive Rights, red. T. Mylly, J.Griffiths, Oxford University Press
• Ketzan E., Kamocki P., Digital Humanities Research under United States and European Copyright Laws [w:] Access and Control in Digital Humanities, , red. S. Hawkins, Routledge 2021
• Kuczerawy A., EU Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Compatibility of Article 13 with the EU Intermediary Liability Regime [w:] Fundamental Rights Protection Online: The Future Regulation of Intermediaries, red. B. Petkova, T. Ojanen, Helsinki 2020,
• Kuczerawy  A., From ‘Notice and Take Down’ to ‘Notice and Stay Down’: Risks and Safeguards for Freedom of Expression [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Intermediary Liability Online, red. G. Frosio, Oxford 2020,
• Kuczerawy A.., General Monitoring Obligations: A New Cornerstone of Internet Regulation in the EU? [w:] Rethinking IT and IP Law – Celebrating 30 years CiTiP, Intersentia, 2019,
• Rosati E. The Digital Services Act and copyright enforcement: The case of Article 17 of the DSM Directive [w:] European Audiovisual Observatory, Unravelling the Digital Services Act package, s. 59 i n.,
• Ruse‑Khan H.G., Automated Copyright Enforcement Online: From Blocking to Monetization of User‑Generated Content [w:] Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law, red. N. Bruun, G.B. Dinwoodie, M. Levin, A. Ohly, Cambridge 2021,
• Scalzini S., The New Related Right for Press Publishers: What Way Forward? [w:] Handbook of European Copyright Law, red. E. Rosati, Routledge, 2021,
• Traple E., Granice eksploracji tekstów i danych na potrzeby maszynowego uczenia się przez systemy sztucznej inteligencji [w:] B.Fischer, A.Pązik, M.Świerczyński, red. Prawo sztucznej inteligencji i nowych technologii, Warszawa 2021
• Vesala J., Press publishers’ right and artificial intelligence, AI and the Media - Reconsidering Rights and Responsibilities [w:]  Pihlajarinne, T. Alen-Savikko, A., Artificial Intelligence and the Media: Reconsidering Rights and Responsibilities, Elgar 2021.

ARTYKUŁY NAUKOWE

• Aguilar A., The New Copyright Directive: Fair remuneration in exploitation contracts of authors and performers – Part 1, Articles 18 and 19,
• Ackermann T., Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverleger: Eine Steuer auf Links oder Sicherung der Pressevielfalt?, ZUM 2019/5
• Angelopoulos Ch., YouTube and Cyando, Injunctions against Intermediaries and General Monitoring Obligations: Any Movement?
• Angelopoulos Ch., On Online Platforms and the Commission’s New Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market,
• Angelopoulos Ch., Quintais J.P., Fixing Copyright Reform: A Better Solution to Online Infringement, JIPITEC 2019/2,
• Arisi M. Riproduzioni di opere d’arte visive in pubblico dominio: l’articolo 14 della Direttiva (EU) 2019/790 e la trasposizione in Italia, Aedon 1/2021, 
• Axhamn J., The New Copyright Directive: Collective licensing as a way to strike a fair balance between creator and user interests in copyright legislation (Article 12),
• Bäcker K., Feindor-Schmidt U., The destruction of copyright—are jurisprudence and legislators throwing fundamental principles of copyright under the bus?, JIPLP 2021/1,,
• Banjeree R. Relevance of Neighbouring Rights in India in the Context of the 2019 European Union Directive, Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Vol 26, January 2021,
• Bensamoun A., Article 17 of Directive 2019/790 or Restoring the Enforceability of Rights: A Balanced Measure, in Balance…, RIDA 2020/4
• Binctin N., TDM: a challenge for artificial intelligence, RIDA 2019/10
• Bosher H., De minimis uses and the German implementation of Art 17 DSM Directive,
• Bottis M., Papadopoulos M., Zampakolas Ch., Ganatsiou P., Text and Data Mining in Directive 2019/790/EU Enhancing Web‑Harvesting and Web‑Archiving in Libraries and Archives, „Open Journal of Philosophy” 2019/9,
• Brettschneider P., Text und Data-Mining – juristische Fallstricke und bibliothekarische Handlungsfelder, Bibliotheksdienst, 55 (2), 2021,
• Bridy A., E U Copyright Reform: Grappling With the Google Effect, „Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law”, Forthcoming,
• Bridy A., The Price Of Closing The “Value Gap”: How The Music Industry Hacked EU Copyright Reform, „Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law” 2020/22
• Brinkhus J., Regelungen zur Erhaltung des digitalen und digitalisierten Kulturerbes im deutschen Urheberrecht– Vom UrhWissG zur Umsetzung der DSM-RL, Recht und Zugang, vol. 2 (2021) nr 1,
• Burii M., Zihlman Z., Intermediaries’ Liability in Light of the Recent EU Copyright Reform, Indian Journal of Intellectual Property Law 12 (2021),
• Burrow S. The Law of Data Scraping: A review of UK law on text and data mining, CREATe Working Paper Series,
• Chałubińska-Jentkiewicz K., Digital Single Market. Cyber Threats and the Protection of Digital Contents: An Overview
• Carnuccio V., The New EU Copyright Directive and the regulation of online digital content providers, The New EU Copyright Directive and the regulation of online digital content providers,
• Carroll M.W., Copyright and the Progress of Science: Why Text and Data Mining Is Lawful, „UC Davis Law Review” 2019/53
• Cassels S., Borboux Ch., Makulec J., Implementing the Press Publisher’s Right: the German and French experience,
• Colangelo G. Torti V., Copyright, Online News Publishing and Aggregators: A Law and Economics Analysis of the EU Reform, International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2019/1,
• Concepción Saiz García, Spain: The Return of Google News, GRUR Int,, 2021,
• Cloutier M., Poland’s Challenge to EU Directive 2019/790: Standing up to the Destruction of European Freedom of Expression, 125 Dick. L. Rev. 161 (2020)
• Curto N., EU Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market and ISP Liability: What’s Next at International Level?,
• Czarny-Drożdżejko, E. The Subject-Matter of Press Publishers’ Related Rights Under Directive 2019/790 on Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market. IIC (2020).
• Danbury R., The DSM Copyright Directive: Article 15: Why and Why not? – Part I,
• Danbury R., The DSM Copyright Directive: Article 15: What? – Part II,
• de la Durantaye K., Back to Basics – European Copyright Law after the DSM Directive. IIC (2021).
• de la Durantaye K.., Regulierungsmöglichkeiten der Verlegerbeteiligung aus juristischer Sicht, ZUM 2020/2
• de la Durantaye K., Reform der Verlegerbeteiligung – Ein Prototyp mit Potenzial, ZUM 2020/3
• de la Durantaye K., Weit und kollektiv – Vergriffene Werke und kollektive Lizenzvergabe mit erweiterter Wirkung nach der DSM-RL, GRUR 2020/1
• de la Durantaye K.., Kuschel L., Vergriffene Werke größer gedacht: Art. 8–11 DSM-Richtlinie, ZUM 2019/8–9
• Drexl J., Hilty R., Desaunettes-Barbero L., Globocnik J. et. all , Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law - Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition of 9 April 2021 on the Current Debate (April 9, 2021). Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 21-10,
• Doring V., Reform der Verlegerbeteiligung – Die Sicht der Autor*innen und Übersetzer*innen belletristischer Werke, ZUM 2020/2
• Döhl F. Hui A., Collateral Damage: Reuse in the Arts and the New Role of Quotation Provisions in Countries with Free Use Provisions After the ECJ’s Pelham, Funke Medien and Spiegel Online Judgments, IIC (2021),
• Döhl F., Zechmann D., Digital Humanities und Recht: Zu den neuen Regeln für das Text und Data Mining (TDM) und ihrem strategischen Potential für die Bibliotheken, in b.i.t. online 23 (2020) Nr. 4,
• Dreier T.,  Die Schlacht ist geschlagen – ein Überblick. Zum Ergebnis des Copyright Package der EU-Kommission, GRUR 2019/8
• Ducato R., Strowel A., Ensuring Text and Data Mining: Remaining Issues With the EU Copyright Exceptions and Possible Ways Out, EIPR 2021,
• Ducato R., Strowel A., Limitations to Text and Data Mining and Consumer Empowerment: Making the Case for a Right to “Machine Legibility”. IIC (2019).
• Dusollier S., The 2019 Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: Some Progress, a Few Bad Choices, and an Overall Failed Ambition, „Common Market Law Review” 2020/4,
• Farrand B. Towards a modern, more European copyright framework or, how to rebrand the same old approach?, EIPR 2019/2,
• Furgał U., The EU press publishers’ right: where do Member States stand?, JIPLP, 2021/8,
• Furgał U., The EU press publishers’ right: where do Member States stand?,
• Furgał U., The implementation of the press publishers’ right in the CDSM Directive: lessons from France,
• Furgał, U., Kretschmer, M., Thomas, A., Memes and Parasites: a discourse analysis of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive. Working Paper. UK Copyright and Creative Economy Centre, Glasgow, doi:10.5281/zenodo.4085050
• Frosio G. Reforming the C-DSM Reform: a User-Based Copyright Theory for Commonplace Creativity, IIC (2020),
• Frosio G., Mendis S., Monitoring and Filtering: European Reform or Global Trend?, Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper 2019/05,
• Ghazal N., Cyfryzacja i udostępnianie zbiorów przez instytucje dziedzictwa kulturowego w świetle przepisów dyrektywy o prawie autorskim na jednolitym rynku cyfrowym, ZNUJ. PPWI 2021
• Ghidini G, Banterle F.,  Copyright, news, and “information products” under the new DSM Copyright Directive,
• Giannopoulou A., The New Copyright Directive: Article 14 or when the Public Domain Enters the New Copyright Directive,
• Giesen B., Godziwe wynagrodzenie twórców i wykonawców w ramach umów o eksploatację w świetle dyrektywy Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2019/790, ZNUJ PPWI 2020/3
• Geiger Ch., The Missing Goal-Scorers in the Artifificial Intelligence Team: Of Big Data, the Fundamental Right to Research and the failed Text and Data Mining limitations in the CSDM Directive, Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series,
• Geiger Ch., Bulayenko O., Creating Statutory Remuneration Rights in Copyright Law: What Policy Options Under the International Legal Framework?,
• Geiger Ch., Frosio G., Bulayenko O., Facilitating Wider Access to Europe’s Cultural Heritage in the Digital Environment: Opinion of the CEIPI on the European Commission’s Copyright Reform Proposal, with a Focus on Access to Out-of‑Commerce Works, JIPITEC 2018/3
• Geiger Ch., Frosio G., Bulayenko O., The Exception for Text and Data Mining (TDM) in the Proposed Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market – Legal Aspects, „Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper” 2018/2,
• Geiger Ch., Jütte B.J., Platform liability under Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive, Automated Filtering and Fundamental Rights: An Impossible Match,
• Geiger Ch., Jütte  B.J.,The EU Commission’s Guidance on Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive – A Guide to Virtue in Content Moderation by Digital Platforms?,  
• Geiger Ch., Jütte B.J., The Challenge to Article 17 CDSM, an opportunity to establish a future fundamental rights-compliant liability regime for online platforms,    
• Geiger Ch., Jütte B.J., Op-Ed: The EU Commission’s Guidance on Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive,   
• Geiger Ch., B.J.Jütte, Towards a Virtuous Legal Framework for Content Moderation by Digital Platforms in the EU? The Commission’s Guidance on Article 17 CDSM Directive in the light of the YouTube/Cyando judgement and the AG’s Opinion in C-401/19,  EIPR 2021,
• Grisse K., After the storm – examining the final version of Article 17 of the new Directive (EU) 2019/790, JIPLP 2019/11
• Grisse K. Nutzbarmachung urheberrechtlich geschützter Textbeständefür die Forschung durch Dritte– Rechtliche Bedingungen und Möglichkeiten, Recht und Zugang 2, 2020.
• Gräbitz A., Die Auswirkungen der Richtlinie (EU) 2019/790 auf wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken, Bibliothekdienst vol. 54 (9)
• Guzel S., Article 17 of the CDSM Directive and the Fundamental Rights: Shaping the Future of the Internet,
• Gülker M., Umsetzung der DSM-Richtlinie: Umgehungsschutz für Kopierschutz bei Computerprogrammen? — Warum die Selbsthilfe zulässig ist und nach dem UrhG-RefE auch bleibt, Computer und Recht, vol. 37, no. 1, 2021,
• Heft S., Mediation im Urheber- recht auf Grundlage der DSM-Richtlinie, MR-Int, 3-4/2020,
• Henke H., Die geplanten Neuregelungen urheberrechtlich zulässigerUnterrichts- und Lehrtätigkeiten, Recht und Zugang, vol. 2 (2021),
• Heesen H., Jüngels L., Der Regierungsentwurf der Text und Data Mining-Schranken(§§ 44b, 60d UrhG-E), Recht und Zugang, vol. 2 (2021) nr 1,
• Hofmann F., Fünfzehn Thesen zur Plattformhaftung nach Art. 17 DSM-RL, GRUR 2019/12
• Holznagel F., Verfassungsrechtliche Fragen der Umsetzung von Art. 17 DSM-RL, ZUM 2020/1
• Hugenholtz B., Three Cheers for the DSM Directive’s Rules on Author’s Contracts – and a Cautionary Note from the Netherlands,
• Husovec M., Over-Blocking: When is the EU Legislator Responsible?,
• Husovec M., Quintais J.P.,  How to License Article 17? Exploring the Implementation Options for the New EU Rules on Content-Sharing Platforms, 
• Husovec M. Quintais J.P., Article 17 of the Copyright Directive: Why the German implementation proposal is compatible with EU law, part 1 and part 2,
• Jaworski S., Die neue Auskunftspflicht im Urheberrecht, GRUR-Prax 2021,398
• Jaworski S. , Die neue Auskunftspflicht nach § 32d UrhG. Reden wir nicht von Uploadfiltern Gastkommentar,
• Jani O., Das neue Presseverlegerrecht – Der Diskussionsentwurf des BMJV missachtet den Willen des Unionsgesetzgebers, ZUM 2020/3
• Jani O., Directive (EU) 2019/790, on copyrights and related rights in the Digital Single Market. An implementation guide to Article 15, niepublikowany maszynopis
• Jütte B.J., Priora G., On the necessity of filtering online content and its limitations: AG Saugmandsgaard Øe outlines the borders of Article 17 CDSM Directive,   
• Jütte B.J., Uneducating copyright – Member States can choose between “ full legal certainty” and patchworked licensing schemes for digital and cross-border teaching activities, EIPR 2019/11
• Kamocki  P., Hannesschläger V., Hoorn E., Kelli A., Kupietz M., Lindén K., Puksas  A., Legal Issues Related to the use of Twitter Data in Language Research,
• Kayle B.V., Copyright Gossip: Exploring Copyright Opinions, Theories, and Strategies on YouTube,
• Kelli  A. et al.,  The Interplay of Legal Regimes of Personal Data, Intellectual Property and Freedom of Expression in Language Research,
• Keller P., A better way to implement Article 17? New German proposal to avoid overblocking,
• Keller P., Article 17: (Mis)understanding the intent of the legislator,   
• Keller P., Article 17 stakeholder dialogue (day 6): Hitting a brick wall,
• Keller P., CJEU hearing in the Polish challenge to Article 17: Not even the supporters of the provision agree on how it should work,
• Keller P., Explainer: What will the DSM directive change for cultural heritage institutions?,
• Keller P., German government draft on Article 17: Two steps forward, one step back,
• Keller P., It’s 23 April 2021, so where is the Advocate General opinion in Case C-401/19 Poland v Parliament and Council,
• Keller P., Our response to the new Austrian copyright implementation proposal,
• Keller P , Taming the upload filters: Pre-flagging vs. match and flag,
• Klass N., FILTER(N) oder nicht? Der Einsatz von Filtertechnologien im Urheberund, Medienrecht, ZUM 2020/5
• Kleinkopf F., Jacke J., Gärtner M., Text-und Data-Mining Urheberrechtliche Grenzen der Nachnutzung wissenschaftlicher Korpora und ihre Bedeutung für die Digital Humanities, MMR Zeitschrift für IT-Recht und Recht der Digitalisierung 2021/3
• Kleinkopf F., Pflüger T., Digitale Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur – Welcher urheberrechtliche Reformbedarf verbleibt nach Umsetzung der DSM-RL durch das Gesetz zum Urheberrecht im digitalen Binnenmarkt?, ZUM 2021
• Klimpel P., Reformen für das kulturelle Erbe!?, Recht und Zugang, vol. 2 (2021) nr 1,
• Klimpel P., Urheberrechtsreform 2021 Neue Chancen für das kulturelle Erbe,
• Kollár P., Mind if I mine? A study on the justification and sufficiency of text and data mining exceptions in the European Union (July 1, 2021),
• Koščik M., Exceptions for Cultural Heritage Institutions under the Copyright Directive in the Digital Single Market, „Grey Journal (TGJ)” 2020/16,
• Kretschmer M., Giblin R., Furgal U., Cooper E., Reversion of Copyright in Europe. A European Intellectual Property Review triple bill,
• Kubiak M., Mysiak B., Odpowiedzialność dostawców usług udostępniania treści on-line i ich użytkowników w kontekście implementacji dyrektywy (UE) 2019/790 w sprawie prawa autorskiego na jednolitym rynku cyfrowym, Prawo Nowych Technologii 2021/1
• Kupiec M., Amerykański fair use i japoński non-enjoyment – drogowskazy dla europejskich rozwiązań prawnych w zakresie TDM?, ZNUJ. PPWI 2021/2
• Lambrecht M., Free Speech by Design – Algorithmic protection of exceptions and limitations in the Copyright DSM directive, JIPITEC 2020/1
• Larroyed A., More than words: The legal translations of Article 17 DCDSM,
• Lazarova A., Re-use the news: between the EU press publishers’ right’s addressees and the informatory exceptions’ beneficiaries, JIPLP 2021/3
• Leistner M., European Copyright Licensing and Infringement Liability Under Art. 17 DSM-Directive Compared to Secondary Liability of Content Platforms in the U.S. – Can We Make the New European System a Global Opportunity Instead of a Local Challenge?,
• Leung D., The impact of the UK’s post-Brexit divergence from the Digital Single Market Directive,
• Linke D., Žikovská P., The Implementation of the Directive on Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market ‒ Conference Report on the Sixth Binational Seminar of the Technische Universität Dresden and Charles University in Prague, GRUR Int. 2021/8,
• Machała W., Stanisławska-Kloc S., E-learning w prawie autorskim (nie tylko w czasie pandemii), MoP 2020/14
• Madiega T., Reform Of The EU Liability Regime For Online Intermediaries: Background On The Forthcoming Digital Services Act,
• Malovic N., Transposing the DSM Directive: the draft Swedish implementation of Article 17,
• Mansila N.M., The transposition of the new Copyright Directive and its impact on the music industry,
• Margoni T., Kretschmer M., A deeper look into the EU Text and Data Mining exceptions: Harmonisation, data ownership, and the future of technology,
• Matlak A., Targosz T., Wyrwiński M., Wybrane aspekty implementacji przepisów dyrektywy 2019/790 i dyrektywy 2019/789 w zakresie udostępniania utworów online, ZNUJ. PPWI 2020/4
• Matulionyte R., TDM Exceptions and trust in AI,
• Metzger A., Pravemann T., Der Entwurf des UrhDaG als Umsetzung von Art. 17 DSM-RL – Ein gesetzgebungstechnischer Drahtseilakt, ZUM 2021, 288
• Metzger A., Senftleben M., Comment of the European Copyright Society on Selected Aspects of Implementing Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market Into National Law,
• Meys R., Data Mining Under the Directive on Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market: Are European Database Protection Rules Still Threatening the Development of Artificial Intelligence?, GRUR Int. 2020/5
• Mezei P., István H., End-User Flexibilities in Digital Copyright Law – An Empirical Analysis of End-user License Agreements,
• Mezei  P. et al., What’s the buzz? Tell me what’s a-happening (around Article 17)? Tales from Hungary, Germany, Italy and Sweden,
• Mišek J. Exception for Text and Data Mining for the Purposes of Scientific Research in the Context of Libraries and Repositories, „The Grey Journal. International Journal on Grey Literature” 2020/16 (Special Winter Issue)
• Montagnani M.., A New Liability Regime for Illegal Content in the Digital Single Market Strategy,
• Montagnani M., Virtues and Perils of Algorithmic Enforcement and Content Regulation in the EU – A Toolkit for a Balanced Algorithmic Copyright Enforcement, „Case Western Reserve Journal of Law, Technology & the Internet” 2019–2020/1,
• Montagnani M., Trapova A., New Obligations for Internet Intermediaries in the Digital Single Market – Safe Harbors in Turmoil?, Journal of Internet Law 2019/7,
• Moreno J., Sepúlveda R., Article 13 on social media and news media: disintermediation and reintermediation on the modern media landscape, Communication&Society vol. 2 (2021),
• Müller‑Terpitz R., Filter als Gefahr für die Meinungspluralität? – Verfassungsrechtliche Erwägungen zum Einsatz von Filtertechnologien, ZUM 2020/3
• Nordemann J.B, Wablinger J., Art. 17 DSM Directive: International Application in EU cross-border scenarios – Or: Why the EU needs a faithful implementation into national law,
• Nordemann J.B., Waiblinger J., Art. 17 DSMCD a class of its own? How to implement Art. 17 into the existing national copyright acts – Also a comment on the recent German German Discussion Draft – Part 2,
• Netanela N.W., Mandating Digital Platform Support for Quality Journalis, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Volume 34, Number 2 Spring 2021,
• Papadopoulou M.D, Kolotourou K., Bottis M., Τhe Exception of Text and Data Mining from the Academic Libraries Standpoint, Open Journal of Social Sciences 9, 
• Peguera M., The New Copyright Directive: Online Content‑Sharing Service Providers lose eCommerce Directive immunity and are forced to monitor content uploaded by users (Article 17),
• Peguera M., Is the Spanish implementation of Art. 17 CDSM compatible with EU Law?,
• Priora G., Catching sight of a glimmer of light: Fair remuneration and the emerging distributive rationale in the reform of EU copyright law, JIPITEC 2019/3,
• Priora G., The principle of appropriate and proportionate remuneration in the CDSM Directive: A reason for hope?, EIPR 2020/1
• Priora G., Towards the Italian implementation of the CDSM Directive,  
• Priora G., The ‘Two Suns’ of EU Digital Copyright Law: Reconciling Rightholders’ and Users’ Interests via Interlegality,
• Quintais J.P., Commission’s Guidance on Art. 17 CDSM Directive: the authorisation dimension,   
• Quintais J.P., The New Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive: A Critical Look, EIPR 2020/1
• Quintais J.P., Frosio G., van Gompel S., Hugenholtz B., H., Husovec M., Jütte B.J., Senftleben M., Safeguarding User Freedoms in Implementing Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive: Recommendations from European Academics,
• Raue B., Die geplanten Text und Data Mining‑Schranken (§§ 44b und 60d UrhG-E), ZUM 2020/3
• B. Raue, Rechtssicherheit für datengestützte Forschung, Die Text-und‑Data‑Mining‑Schranken in Art. 3 und 4 DSM-Richtlinie, ZUM 2019/8–9
• Rauer N., Bibi A., Extended Collective Licencing in the DSM Directive ‒ An Opportunity to Make Art. 17 DSM Directive Work?, GRUR International, 2021,
• Reda J., Selinger J., Servatius M., Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market: a Fundamental Rights Assessment,
• Reda J., Selinger J., Germany attempts to square the circle in its implementation of Article 17 CDSMD – Part 1,  
• Reda J., Selinger J., Germany attempts to square the circle in its implementation of Article 17 CDSMD – Part 2,  
• Reda J., Selinger J., YouTube/Cyando – an Important Ruling for Platform Liability – Part 1,
• Reda J., Selinger J., YouTube/Cyando – an Important Ruling for Platform Liability – Part 2,
• Reda J.,Keller P., European Commission back-tracks on user rights in Article 17 Guidance,
• Reda J., Keller P., Whitepaper: Proposal to leverage Article 17 to build a public repository of Public Domain and openly licensed works,
• Reda J., P.Keller,  What Member States can learn from the AG opinion on Article 17,
• Rendas T., Are copyright-permitted uses “exceptions”, “limitations” or “user rights”? The special case of Article 17 CDSM Directive,
• Riss T.  Rognstad O., Comment of the European Copyright Society on the Implementation of the Extended Collective Licensing Rules (Arts. 8 and 12) of the Directive (EU) 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market,
• Riis T., Remuneration Rights in EU Copyright Law, IIC  (2020).
• Rosati E., CJEU rules on platform liability under copyright law, safe harbours, and injunctions,
• Rosati E., Copyright as an Obstacle or an Enabler? A European Perspective on Text and Data Mining and its Role in the Development of AI Creativity, Asia Pacific Law Review 27, 2019, nr 2,
• Rosati E., Commission unveils Article 17 Guidance: 3 highlights,
• Rosati E., DSM Directive Series #2: Is the press publishers’ right waivable?,
• Rosati E., DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go?,
• Rosati E., DSM Directive Series #4: Article 17 obligations… in a chart,
• Rosati E., DSM Directive Series #5: Does the DSM Directive mean the same thing in all language versions? The case of ‘best efforts’ in Article 17(4)(a),
• Rosati E., DSM Directive Series #6: ‘hyperlinking’ in the press publishers’ right,
• Rosati E., Does the duration of the storage matter? Live streaming providers as ‘online content sharing service providers’ under Directive 2019/790, EIPR 2020,
• Rosati E., Flattery or freeloading? The use of look-a-likes within the context of image rights,
• Rosati E., Italy has transposed the DSM Directive,
• Rosati E. Five considerations for the transposition and application of Article 17 of the DSM Directive,
• Rosati E., Linking and copyright in the shade of VG Bild-Kunst,
• Rosati, E. The DSM Directive Two Years On: Do Things Ever Get Easier?. IIC 52 (2021).
• Rosati E., Towards the national transpositions of the DSM Directive: various techniques to ... do as you please, 
• Rosati E. , The legal nature of Article 17 of the Copyright DSM Directive, the (lack of) freedom of Member States, and why the German implementation proposal is not compatible with EU law,
• Samuelson P., Legally Speaking: Questioning A New Intellectual Property Right For Press Publishers,
• Samuelson P., Text and Data Mining of In-Copyright Works: Is It Legal?,
• Saphiro T., Poland v. EU – The Battle for the Value Gap,
• Saphiro T., Live and Let Live – Copyright and the DSA,
• Schmon Ch., Article 17 Copyright Directive: The Court of Justice’s Advocate General Rejects Fundamental Rights Challenge But Defends Users Against Overblocking,
• Schack H., Das neue Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverleger – Ein schlechtes Vorbild wird reformiert, ZUM 2020/3
• Schulze G., Das Urhebervertragsrecht nach Erlass der EU-Richtlinie über das Urheberrecht im digitalen Binnenmarkt, GRUR 2019/7
• Schwemer S. F., Article 17 at the Intersection of EU Copyright Law and Platform Regulation, Nordic Intellectual Property Law Review 2020/3,
• Senftleben M., Angelopoulos Ch., The Odyssey of the Prohibition on General Monitoring Obligations on the Way to the Digital Services Act: Between Article 15 of the E-Commerce Directive and Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, 
• Senftleben M., Bermuda Triangle – Licensing, Filtering and Privileging User‑Generated Content Under the New Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market,
• Senftleben M., Institutionalized Algorithmic Enforcement – The Pros and Cons of the EU Approach to UGC Platform Liability, „Florida International University Law Review” 2020/14,
• Senftleben M., The Original Sin – Content ‘Moderation’ (Censorship) in the EU, GRUR Int. 2020/4
• Senftleben M., Ch. Angelopoulos, An Endless Odyssey? Content Moderation Without General Content Monitoring Obligations,
• Senftleben M., Margoni T., et al., Ensuring the Visibility and Accessibility of European Creative Content on the World Market - The Need for Copyright Data Improvement in the Light of New Technologies and the Opportunity Arising from Article 17 of the CDSM Directive (February 12, 2021),   
• Sganga C., The Many Metamorphoses of Related Rights in EU Copyright Law: Unintended Consequences or Inevitable Developments?, GRUR Int., 2021/9 ,
• Spindler G., Art. 17 DSM-RL und dessen Vereinbarkeit mit primärem Europarecht, Zugleich ein Beitrag zu Umsetzungsmöglichkeiten, GRUR 2020/3
• Spindler G., The Liability system of Art. 17 DSMD and national implementation – contravening prohibition of general monitoring duties?, JIPITEC 2019/3,
• Spoerri T., On Upload‑Filters and other Competitive Advantages for Big Tech Companies under Article 17 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, JIPITEC 2019/2,
• Starvidou S., Copyright in the Digital Single Market in Europe: The Quest for Legal Certainty Still Remains, GRUR Int. 1/2021
• Staats R., Kollektive Lizenzvergabe mit erweiterter Wirkung nach Art. 12 der DSM-Richtlinie – eine sinnvolle Lösung für Deutschland?, ZUM 2019/8–9
• Staats R., Reform der Verlegerbeteiligung – Die Sicht der Verwertungsgesellschaften, ZUM 2020/2
• Steinhauer E.W., Das Gesetz zur Anpassung des Urheberrechts an dieErfordernisse des digitalen Binnenmarktes– Ein Überblick zu den geplanten Regelungen für Kultur- und Wissenschaftseinrichtungen, Recht und Zugang, vol. 2 (2021) nr 1,
• Stieper M., Die Richtlinie über das Urheberrecht im digitalen Binnenmarkt, ZUM 2019/3
• Stieper M., Totgesagte leben länger – Die Wiederauferstehung des Presseverleger‑Leistungsschutzes, ZUM 2020/3
• Stockton-Brown M., Out-of-commerce, out of mind: widening public access to out-of-commerce copyright works in film archives through the DSM Directive,
• Synodinou T., The New Copyright Directive: Out of commerce works (Articles 8 to 11): is it possible to untie the Gordian knot of mass digitisation and copyright law without cutting it off?, part 1 and part 2
• Synodinou T, Lawfulness for Users in European Copyright Law: Acquis and Perspectives, JIPITEC 2019/1,
• Szaroma M., Korzystanie z utworów i innych przedmiotów objętych ochroną w cyfrowej i transgranicznej działalności dydaktycznej w świetle art. 5 dyrektywy 2019/790, ZNUJ. PPWI 2021/1
• Targosz T., Poland’s Challenge to the DSM Directive – and the Battle Rages On…,
• Taylor H., Online Platforms: The New Brokers of Copyrights? An EU Perspective,
• Theodoros Ch., Copyright lessons on Machine Learning: what impact on algorithmic art? JIPITEC 3/2019,
• Tylec G. Roszczenie o zapłatę godziwej rekompensaty za korzystanie z utworu osieroconego, Studia Prawnicze KUL,  1/2021,
• Ueno T., The Flexible Copyright Exception for ‘Non-Enjoyment’ Purposes ‒ Recent Amendment in Japan and Its Implication, GRUR Int., 2021/ 2
• van de Ven D., New press publishers’ right: Dutch transposition,
• von Welser M., Plattformhaftung nach dem Urheberrechts-Diensteanbieter-Gesetz (UrhDaG), GRUR-Prax 2021
• Vučković R.M., Cultural Heritage Institutions during and after the pandemic – copyright perspective, EU and comparative law issues and challenges series ECLIC, vol. 5, 2021,
• Vučković R.M., The Effectiveness of the Press Publishers’ Related Right, IIC 52 (2021),
• Wallace  A., Euler E., Revisiting Access to Cultural Heritage in the Public Domain: EU and International Developments, IIC 2020/51
• Wandtke A.A., L.Leidl, Die dogmatische Trennung zwischen Herstellungs- und Nutzungsvergütung im Arbeitsverhältnis nach der DSM-RL, GRUR RR Heft 3/2021,
• Wandtke A.A., Grundsätze der Richtlinie über das Urheberrecht im digitalen Binnenmarkt, NJW 2019/26
• Wang Q., News aggregators and copyright in the European Union and the United States in the digital age: Evolution, comparison and implications,
• Westkamp, G. Two Constitutional Cultures, Technological Enforcement and User Creativity: The Impending Collapse of the EU Copyright Regime?. IIC (2021).
• Woods L., Copyright and the Internet: Poland v Parliament and Council (Case C-401/19), Opinion of the Advocate General,
• Würtenberger G., Freische S., Stellungnahme des GRUR-Fachausschusses für Urheber- und Verlagsrecht zur Umsetzung der EU-RLn im Urheberrecht (DSM- RL (EU) 2019/790 und Online‑ SatCab‑RL (EU) 2019/789), GRUR 2019/11
• Wyrwiński M., Nowe obowiązki dostawy treści lub usług cyfrowych. Uwagi wybrane do dyrektywy Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady (UE) 2019/770, ZNUJ. PPWI 2020/2
• Xalabarder R., The Principle of Appropriate and Proportionate Remuneration of ART.18 Digital Single Market Directive: Some Thoughts for Its National Implementation,
• Xalabarder R., The remuneration of authors and performers, RIDA 2020/4
• Zapala I. Territorial scope of the authorization requirement and liability regime under Directive (EU) 2019/790 on copyright and related rights in the digital single market, JIPLP 2021/8

UPUBLICZNIONE PRACE DYPLOMOWE

• Axelsson S., A fair balance? - Copyright exceptions and limitations under the Digital Single Market Directive,
• Boehm K., Article 17(7) of Directive 2019/790 on Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market,
• Christensen K., A European solution for Text and Data Mining in the development of creative Artificial Intelligence: With a specific focus on articles 3 and 4 of the Digital Signel Market Directive,
• Havela S., Quotation as an Autonomous Concept of EU Copyright Law and Its Compatibility with Online Content-Sharing Services,
• Shimkova A., The EU press publishers' right: past, present, and future,
• Svensson G., Text and Data Mining in EU Copyright Law,
• Vanntusko D. Conflicting interests in European Union copyright law: A socio-legal analysis of what problem representations Article 17 DSMD is grounded in,

MATERIAŁY OPUBLIKOWANE PRZEZ KOMISJĘ EUROPEJSKĄ

• Communication from the Commission to the  European Parliament and the Council. Guidance on Article 17 of Directive 2019/790 on Copyright in the Digital Single Market
• Report on the use of collective licensing mechanisms with an extended effect under Article 12(6) of Directive 2019/790/EU on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market,

STRONY INTERNETOWE

• Article 17 implementation guidance: Strong user rights safeguards with a giant loophole,
• Ceatl.DSM Implementation Flash Survey Summary,
• Communia. Eurovision DSM contest,
• Europe’s press publishers & Microsoft call for Australian-style arbitration mechanism in Europe,
• Europe’s TDM Exception for Research: Will It Be Undermined By Technical Blocking From Publishers?,
• [Event Report] IFIM Holiday Seminar - Tales of the New Doctors of Law,
• France once more fails to demonstrate support for its interpretation of Article 17,
• Finnish Article 17 implementation proposal prohibits the use of automated upload filters,
• German Article 17 implementation law sets the standard for protecting user rights against overblocking,
• Open Knowledge Day 2021 Report,
• Open letter on Article 17: Is the Commission about to abandon its commitment to protect fundamental rights?
• Recommendations on Copyright and its role in the Digital Transformation of the Cultural Heritage Sector,  
• Secondary Publisher Right, v. 2. Proposal to LIBER BOARD,
• The Croatian proposal to implement the new education exception: it could be better,  
• The Italian transposition of the CDSM Directive: A missed opportunity?
• The implementation challenge of art. 17 CDSM directive: an “institutional” option?
• Wie der „Pastiche“ ins Urheberrecht kam und was er für das kreative Schaffen bedeut,
• YouTube Copyright Transparency Report: Overblocking is real,

NAGRANIA WYKŁADÓW I WYDARZEŃ

• Holiday Seminar – Tales of the New Doctors of Law,
• EU Copyright Law - The State of Play and Future Directions,
• Recreating Europe - CDSMD implementation Day,
• The Making of EU Copyright, 
• The Regulatory Landscape for Copyright Content Moderation: Evaluation and Future Trajectories,
• Video Recording of COMMUNIA Salon on the role of ex-ante user rights safeguards in implementing Article 17,
• Video Recording of COMMUNIA’s 10th Anniversary,
• Video Recording of COMMUNIA Salon on the Article 17 guidance and the launch of the Eurovision implementation tracker,
• Webinar - Automated Content Moderation: Copyright and Controversial Content,